- "The wrong shall fail,
the right prevail,
- with peace on Earth, goodwill to man..."
- The Christians
- ---- page 2 ----
Editorial: These are purely the opinions of the author and not of any religious organization.
We are told that we should not expose the violent teachings of someone else's religion; we should only focus on the peaceful aspects. The greatest tragedy ever would be if a religion were to preach "death to all unbelievers." Is there such a religion? The president of the United States announced that Islam is a "peaceful religion." That is the first time I have ever heard that he is an expert on Islam. Well, it turns out he isn't. Dr. R. Morey has a lot to say about that.
Which religion really actually believes in peace without contradiction in its teachings: Christianity or its competition? Good question. Here is a clue: Christ rode into Jerusalem on a donkey and preached peace; Muhammed rode into Mecca on a horse with a sword, and the blood flowed. If this is true, what do you expect Muhammed's followers to do, ride into New York on a donkey handing out pamphlets preaching peace?
Western society has largely turned their collective backs on their relationship with Jesus Christ. The competition feels emboldened and is renewing efforts to become the main religion in the world. Traditional tactics are employed - the three choices, as enunciated by Muhammed and, yes, violence. How many know that Muhammed was a military conqueror, whose goal was to confiscate the wealth of the conquered? Yes , money and power at it again. Those who are the most knowledgeable about the teachings of Muhammed are behind the violence, which their religion teaches. Most ordinary Muslims do not know what the true teachings of Islam are, and if they did, would no longer be Muslims. That is why Muhammed didn't want questions, only submission. Would you accept a package from a stranger on the street without asking "what's in it?" Of course not. But that is what Islam wants. Yes, there are two faces of Islam. And no, all Muslims are not terrorists any more than all Christians belong to KKK. Why are they not terrorists? Part of the reason is that most Muslims don't know their religion any more than Christians. They all believe their religion is peaceful, not knowing or perhaps wanting to know the dark side. These are the Muslims who become targets of those who take their religious commands seriously - ie. serious students of the religion. Islam means submission - don't ask any questions, just do as you're told. And if you decide to leave the religion, Muhammed has a plan for those people as well. You guessed it. One fact is true: in many parts of the world Christians are being driven out or forced to convert to Islam. It is odd that all this is done by this peaceful religion. It is said that some extremists have corrupted Islam and it is they who are responsible for Islamic terrorism. But Craig Winn, the world's leading expert on Islamic terrorism, says that according to Allah the most vile of creatures is a peace-loving Muslim, which explains why moderate Muslims are also targets. (CBN News) God bless all victims of terrorism.
Destroying the Family Swedish Style
When I was just a new little kid on the block in Canada, I can remember our family going through some hard times as new immigrants. Who do you think came to help us? Was it the Communists, the Socialists, or the Christians? It was the Christians of course. Where were the others? Well they were out there looking after Number 1! Dispite all that they profess, they are just as greedy as the Capitalists, maybe even more so, because they are always after the fruits of other hard-working folks' labors. Every time they see someone drive by with a nice car, they just might think that the person stole it from the poor working man who takes the bus. This view and the hatred it brings out, is the basis of socialist thought - they don't want God to change hearts, they want to be that God. They want everyone to be the same, the earth to be homogenous. This of course is absurd, because equality is a lie of Satan.
They want us to believe that these Marxists are not greedy, they just want to share. Well, they have nothing to share because they sit around in beer parlors philosophizing about why they are poor, (someone else's fault) planning how they are going to take away all the shops and farms, and the fruits of others' hard work and redistributing what actually then becomes scarce goods. That is being more greedy than a person who is willing to work hard to have something and employing others. Now, taking over production is difficult these days, so they take over control of the results of production instead.
The Christians did not ask what was in it for them, they just gave from their hearts, to the needy children. So it is baffling why Christianity is thought of as bad, unless their real motive is to have everyone controlled by the state, and Christians (forces for freedom) are hindering state control of children. While it is true that Christians can be bad like anyone else, it doesn't mean it is Christ's fault, or that the religion must be stompped out. He told people how to behave, and still does with laws that never change. He did his best to change humanity towards love, which He thought was the most important characteristic in mankind we should be cultivating. He did not, like Muslims, (anti-freedom forces) tell people it is OK to lie, or kill unbelievers, although the Roman power hungry Catholic Church did just that. The US and therefore Canadian (tied to American whims) governments want to destroy the Christian foundations of the nation, and steps were taken to water down Christianity as a dominant force. This created a situation that was totally new to the greatest democracy in the history of the world: government sponsored secular society, while opening the doors wide to other religions, and severely limiting more Christians from immigrating. Hence we see the majority of immigrants now are from non-Christian countries. The government gave their approval to all kinds of gross TV programs (destroy the children's Christian morals) and ideas that corrupt young minds, but only just tolerate Christian messages. The government has decided to attack the Christian foundations of Canadian and American society by increasing Muslim immigration (anti-freedom forces) to justify their new secular education. (anti-freedom forces) This happened at the very same time that Christianity was removed from schools, c. 1961, promoted by Senator T. Kennedy.
The Attack on the Family
A British journalist returning from Sweden said "I have seen the future and it doesn't work." Communism today has gone underground. It has taken on very subtle disguises, where it is difficult for anyone to recognize it as such. So one of the biggest forces for evil today is based on this lie: we can create a utopia if we could change human nature, as Lenin stated. Sweden has attempted to create such a society using "middle of the road" form of socialism. But anyone who takes a closer look at Sweden's socialism will discover that being in the "middle of the road" is unsafe at any speed.
The left has abandoned its attempts to control the means of production. They discovered that the best way to bring about a collectivized, socialized system, is by a frontal attack on the family and by controlling the free enterprise system. So instead of expropriating the means of production, they made sure they had control of the results of production.
Read this story by Eric Brodin.
United States "one nation under God" was to become secularized by teaching kids that they were not created by God, they evolved from Apes. The excuse is: "separation of church and state." I don't understand, you mean the founding fathers actually wanted this - what we have now? If they did, why did they not implement it back then? No, they did not want this situation we have today - that is not what they meant. They only meant that no Christian religion should be favored over others, ie. there should be no state religion as in Russia or Iran. They did not mean take God out of government run buildings and out of children's daily lives at school, obviously. This is what happened in Russia, and they saw it didn't work so why do we do the same? So if we behaved like animals, it was OK, because that is really what we are, imply the teachers. The Lord's Prayer, which had been read daily since the founding of this great nation, was removed from the classroom because it glorifies God, not man. Our modern politicians, who listen to punk rock and Michael Jackson, are wiser than the founding fathers, is the implication. I believe this was the root cause of the moral degeneration of the nation. What would happen now to this great nation? Morality was replaced by gay pride, drugs and other perversions. The need to have a replacement for belief in God is powerful, and make no mistake, it must be replaced. Drugs, including alcohol, was the replacement, as in the Soviet Union, where alcohol abuse contributed to the nation's downfall. As a result, diseases related to drug use and sex increased alarmingly and became even deadlier. Natural disgust of perversions that spread disease is now called "phobia," eg. h_m_phobe, by which they mean that the fear is irrational, not being based on anything in reality. This is simply not true. Try the fear of God's retribution for one. Governments became allied with perverts, against normal people, in the name of "human rights." Gays became emboldened, flaunting it in everyone's faces, daring them to do or say something so they could accuse you of "gaybashing." Alarming increases in anxiety in the population and drugs to treat it became a reality. At least 20% of the population was now on some kind of drugs which were just making things worse, not better. Then in January 2003, FDA approved prozac for kids eight years old! A drug that acts like LSD on the brain ie. serotonin reuptake inhibition. The root causes were not being addressed.
When the United States' and Canadian school systems decided to remove
this "offensive" Lord's Prayer from their schools, it initiated a process that is still going today. Then they tried to stop free speech. Students were now to be more "tolerant" of all religions, so we could not have
any of them in class or even the school - and paradoxically took away the basic freedom of
religion from the students. Many teachers are trying to also prevent students
from exercising their rights of free worship on school property. The courts
have had no choice but to uphold the US Constitution in these matters,
stopping such action and allowing free speech. The schools now proudly
say that the children have "freedom" to learn whatever others
such as teacher's unions, not parents, (Go
Ask Alice at Columbia University) want them to learn.
You are probably familiar with the attempts by the school system to
teach "values" to kids - new values - to replace the old "bad"
values such as Bible reading and prayer. No more "thou shalt not kill"
or "thou shalt not steal." One such situational ethics lesson
comes to mind. The kids are asked to decide which person in a lifeboat
should be thrown overboard. From this lesson the children learn that there really is no right or wrong, we can each decide for ourselves, and there will not be punishment
in this life or the next. If the kids could decide such things, then perhaps
they can also decide which fellow students they should "dispose of."
All kinds of wierd ideas were now taught, but absolutely not the
Ten Commandments, that's dangerous! Teaching grade one kids that h_m_sexuality
is ok, against the wishes and protests of parents - no problem. Quoting that pervert
Kinsey has become more popular than quoting the Bible, and now our schools
and universities are
beginning to promote perversions of the worst kind. People have a right
to a little sanity and
common sense in their lives.
Parents must not give up their primary role, that of nurturing kids
to adulthood. Don't trust anyone else with this important responsibility.
Once certain attitudes are formed, you can never change them. Governments,
through schools, hijacked the moral education of kids, which therefore
must be returned to the parents. Schools should stick to reading, writing
and arithmetic, areas they have been slipping in instead of trying to teach
their own morality, which should be the parent's responsibilty, or under
parental controls in the schools. Meanwhile the kids are getting more and
more screwed up by these pedagogs who have changed from traditional values
to new ones that have been thought up by "experts" in child psychology.
For example those who take kids away from parents or foster parents based
on their "professional" opinions. I have studied with many of
these psychologists, and many of them are more screwed up than the kids
they are working with. It is obvious these psychologies, such as the situational
ethics lesson previously mentioned, are not working, because most of them
are based on poor science and opinion. Take this communist Ben
our kids) for example, who figured he knew more than the Bible, and
after whose teachings a generation of kids have been raised. Let me repeat:
the children of America (and Canada - Canadians follow everything the Americans
do.) have been getting the communist's version of raising kids. We all
know what happened in Russia don't we. A generation of kids were basically
They all try to instill moral values, but without a set moral code to
go by, just opinion which changes depending on which model is being taught in the Universities. The fact is, nothing (not even teaching the kids to
call teachers "sir" and ma'am" which is being tried now)
can replace the Christian values that were removed from schools, nor the
mother at home (which, I realize, is not a very popular idea nowadays,
especially since in many cases, the woman "has to" - not a need
but a want in most cases - work and stay home mothers are made to feel
worthless). If a woman only gave 15 minutes a day to a marriage, how long would it last? Yet mothers are told that they should not worry about it, 15 minutes before bedtime is enough. It is child neglect, promoted by the state. We inflict psychological and spiritual pain on our generation of children and what we are seeing today is increased stress in children and their anger coming back at us, our society.
It is fashionable today to say that schools are not the place to teach
Christian values. They come just short of saying they no longer believe
in them, which is true in most cases. But these same people wish to put
into the kids their own substitutes in moral education such as Go Ask
Alice, which most parents do not agree with. For years they have said
they don't want Christian values poured down their throats, but now that
there is a vaccuum there they don't mind pouring their garbage into our
kids. Are you going to let children decide for themselves? (a popular opinion)
Will you also let them decide whether they should eat their vegetables,
brush their teeth or to have sex at 12? Can you see the falacy of this
way of thinking? Putting prayer back in schools and babies with their mothers
(oh, heaven forbid, we can't have that) could be the salvation of our children
and would go a long way to fix what's wrong with society: government's
intrusion in our lives. If prayer in school was good for kids
until 1962, why not now? In 1962, kids knew better than
bringing guns to school. After all they were taught every day: "Father...
forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us."
Now kids get the idea it is better to get even, end of story.
Recently the Canadian National radio CBC gave a platform to a person of eastern extraction who put down shamelessly Christians who have the nerve to say Jesus Christ
is Lord. The anti-Christian rhetoric of CBC is very similar to the
anti-semitism of the Nazis and Communists. Shame on CBC. This is a double
standard, because which religion does not think their religion is the correct
one? If they thought they were all equal, they would not be in their own
religion, would they? They might as well go to a Christian church one week
and a Hindu temple the next. This person failed to point out that the Christian
countries are the most tolerant in the world. The Muslims are the among
the least tolerant, because other religions are not even allowed in many
Muslim countries. Muslims are not allowed to question their religion either, such as who wrote the various sections of the book etc. Their religion wants total submission, no questions. (According to the Koran, they are even allowed to lie, or do violence in the name of Allah. According to SWRC, Allah was a moon God prior to becoming the Muslim God.) The next day CBC put a Christian politician on the spot
(a week before the election 2000) by asking him how his belief in God would
affect his job if he became Prime Minister of Canada. Since the CBC has
never asked such a question from any politician previously, Stockwell Day (not that I agree with his politics, but it was demonstrative of hatred of Christianity by CBC) refused to answer, and quite rightly. It is obvious that the CBC has no love for the Christian religion, to put it mildly. It portrays Christians
as bigotted, and by extension, Stockwell Day. Here is an anti-Christian
national broadcasting company, paid by the taxpayer, that takes such a
political stand for status quo of a corrupt politician and against a candidate
because of his religion.
But we never hear these anti-Christian people in CBC saying we should
ban Christmas, although I would expect exactly that in the near future. They might call it something else that's all. This is because they don't mind it being used to glorify their god: money. What hypocracy. What a nest of hypocrits.
in schools - quotes
"Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free,"
said Jesus. Without it we are dead. With it, but lacking redemption, we
are lost without a saviour like Jesus. "The only freedom that can
be retained is the freedom that is given by Jesus as the Lord over our
conscience." John Calvin
Some, such has Humanists and Marxists, may say that belief in God
is the result of fear, guilt and superstition, that Christianity stands
for oppression of freedom. This freedom they talk about was tried in the
largest sociological laboratory in history: the Soviet Union. Their kind
of freedom has lead to not freedom, but slavery and finally total breakdown
of society. Today's Western "newly found freedom" is helping
to make society fly apart from the centrifical force caused by all the
directions this new freedom seeks. Christ is a force which tries to pull
inward all the parts, toward the centre, Himself, to prevent them from
flying apart. Denial of this positive force by accepting that Christianity
is dangerous, like the Communists, may lead to first the moral destruction
of the children, then total collapse of this system, like the Soviet system.
We wanted to be more "tolerant" so we removed prayer from
school. No more "thou shalt not kill" or "thou shalt not
steal" - we were told by socialist politicians that children should
not have these things "shoved down their throats." Now the children
have no conscience, stealing from and killing their classmates, and the
parents are asking: why? Tolerance can be reflected in the laws of a country,
it does not have to be flaunted in the face of the people, especially children
on a daily basis. Children should be made aware of the laws, and leave
it at that. Canada and the United States are Christian countries that tolerate
other religions, but this tolerance should not mean removing the Christian
component in our culture and its institutions. But now the government does
not wish to take a religious position at all, and by so doing it sends
a message to the children: there is no right or wrong set of beliefs, and
no right or wrong, no hope. In fact, Senator Kennedy has been promoting for decades, reduction of Christian immigration completely, and increasing Muslim and other religions, for the purpose of watering down, destroying the Christian basis of society. After 911, this was intensified. (SWRC) People often refuse to believe this because they think Kennedy is a good Catholic.
The War Against the Family
Radical feminists want us to believe that, except for a few minor
anatomical differences, men and women are the same. (equality illusion)
But every field of science declares that biology is destiny. First
feminists say men and women are the same, then they claim that men are
more violent because they have too much testosterone, and make a big joke
about it like men are a bunch of violent buffoons - and therefore women
should rule over men. Are feminists scientists? Where is their data? They
have none, just their socialist, collectivist ideology. They have also
succeeded in convincing women that men unfairly occupy positions of dominance
because of stereotypical socialization (victim illusion: boys and girls
are raised differently, owing to an exploitive patriarchal society); and
traditional sex and family roles must be abandoned (the individualism
illusion: life is personal and autonomous, not social). Finally, they want
a complete transformation of society to bring the egalitarian utopia into
existence (the rationalism illusion: the idea that sufficiently prolonged
social engineering will end human ignorance and will perfect faulty institutions).
These were tried in Soviet society. The results were disastrous.
So, feminists constantly contradict themselves; first they say
they are the same, then different, and finally men are just bad - too much
testosterone, poor creatures. But, they will show the world how to make
a perfect society - put women in top jobs, and their kids in day care.
That is their solution to the world's problems. Meanwhile, the abandoned,
stressed out kids are being destroyed. Brainwashing by feminists is always
wrong, but maternal instincts are almost always correct. Day care can never
take the place of the mother. Children need their real mothers for
more than a token fifteen minutes before bed time. The collective raising
of kids has been proven false in the Soviet Union - don't follow the same
path to your own destruction of your children.
The reason that all the special interest groups such as radical feminists
have been successful in taking away rights from the traditional family
is because the traditional guardians of family values such as the church
have allowed it to happen. The Christian leaders did not fight hard enough.
Political Correctness and Religions
Probably the most politically incorrect religion is Christianity. That is why politically correct secular media stay away from trying to make Chrisianity look good. They prefer to lump it in with all the other religions and say "they are all the same, mostly bad."
The Roots of Terrorism
Christianity versus Islam, the old clash of ideologies - fiction and truth. Koran states "...and Muhammed is his prophet." So how do you define prophet? In the Bible, a prophet is one who fortells the future, not just one who receives messages from God. Future events then confirm that the prophet was actually prophecying. The Bible tells us not to listen to "false prophets" or those whose prophecies don't come true. Does Satan have the power to appear as an angel? Why not? Muhammed claimed that he got the Koran from Angel Gabriel. The Bible is full of prophecies which came true, such as those in the Old Testament. If you doubt the Bible, you must check out the issue of fulfilled prophecies; there are a whole bunch of them that happened exactly as written. It also fortells what will happen in the end times, which is good to know. What did Muhammed prophecy? He merely took the old pagan practises and declared them to have come down from the only God, Allah, the Moon God which was worshipped by the Arab pagans, which was one of the Meccan 360 or so Gods. He abolished all the others and kept only one, which he declared to be the "only" one, the greatest (of the 360 gods). Allah is the greatest, he declared. The Koran is therefore a collection of fairy tales handed down by tradition, that Muhammed declared came straight from God. Most of the traditions had already existed before Islam. They claim Muhammed did not force anyone to join his new religion. No, he didn't but what they don't reveal is that he gave them a choice: convert or die, no force was used. Muhammed rode into Mecca on horseback with the sword, chop, chop, anyone who did not convert, and the blood flowed. Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey preaching love. But you say Christian religion is full of bloodshed. Yes, by violent men, but not the teachings of Jesus. Jesus commanded Peter to put away his sword. The early church in Rome disobeyed Jesus' teachings.
According to Dr. R. Morey, who has successfully debated Islamic scholars, history reveals that Muslim traditions existed already before Muhammed was born. He told his followers such nonsense as Satin resided in the nose during the night, he cut the moon in half with his sword, you can beat your wife if she doesn't obey, you can lie, Allah was the greatest liar of them all because he can do anything he wants to further his cause, and there is no assurance of going to heaven unless you kill someone for Islam etc. etc. The peaceful quotes used to "prove" Islam is peaceful originate from the early writings but as Muhammed's military conquests and victories increased, so did his hostility towards Christians. By the way, an infidel is someone who believes Christ is the Messiah. And most Muslims know what is supposed to be done with them. That they refuse, is admirable, but some obey. These are the roots of terrorism. Muhammed got his revelations while posessed by demons, he was epileptic - the "sheeted one" - because they threw a sheet over him during his attacks. Asked how they know Muhammed was a prophet, Muslims say he had a big hairy mole on his shoulder. That is proof! (he needed medical attention for his epilepsy and the mole) He told his followers that Jesus is not the son of God, and the Christian trinity is God who had sex with Mary and they had a son, Jesus. This is a lie, of course. What a terrible situation to be in! When Muslims are asked about these things, they deny them, Islam means peace. Anyone who uses violence and force is said to not be following the tenates of Islam. Is that true? How can it be, if there is so much violence associated with it? Here is an example of "peaceful" Islam: Forced conversions to Islam including circumcisions.
But are all religions the same? What about us in the West, we who think our society and values are better than those in India, Arabia, Iraq, or Russia, for example. Is our society, which has developed out of Judeo-Chrisian values, better? We are all but told by the government not to say Christ is the only way. Soon we won't even be able to say Christmas. There is a larger plot in the works than just denying children God in schools. Do educators, when discussing religions of the world, have any reason to tell children that Chrisianity is better than say, Islam?
Would you agree with the Bible saying: "you shall know them by their fruits?" In other words, if you want to evaluate something, look at the fruits. I am sure you will answer in the affirmative if you are a practical person with common sense. Well then, which religion treats women the best: Christians, Muslims, Budhists, Hindus, Sikhs...or any other religion? Women in all but the first are treated badly. Bound feet, playthings of the rich businessmen, genital mutilation in Africa, etc. Women in Christian countries are the freest. Whoever follows Christ has been set free, as He promised. Christ's teachings elevate women to where they ought to be. In most other religions, and countries, women are dirt under the feet of men. And which country respects all religions: the Arab countries, China, African countries? No, again, it is the Christian countries. So, I beg anyone's pardon who says that Christ's teachings do not lead to the best way of living known to man.
America was founded by Christian reformers, followers of Jesus Christ, not Muhammed. There would be no free America if the foundation of North America was Islam. I shudder to think what it would be like: Iran, or perhaps Arabia where women have no rights. America (and Canada) was also known as the "land of the free." So it was not political correctness that was responsible for the freedom of women in America, or Western Europe, which is mostly Protestant. While in Eastern Europe, under Orthodoxy, women's position still continues to be much lower than in the West. Can we objectively state therefore, that all religions are the same? Think about it. Freedom versus slavery to a repressive religion, or no religion at all - no hope - which will we teach our kids is best? Consider Finland and Russia. Why are the women freer in Finland than in Russia? Russia did not have a Martin Luther to lead people to the teachings of Jesus. But you might say, doesn't the Orthodox religion do that too? The answer is no. Russians persecute other people, especially Christians and Jews, Finns do not. The roots are in their religion. Finns are followers of Christ. The Orthodox religion, which is similar to Catholicism that persecuted and killed millions of people, is an unbiblical (often evil) combination of Church and State that mixes lies, truth and paganism, and does not follow Christ's teachings. Therefore countries with Catholic style religions persecute and kill others because of political viewpoint. (eg. Central America, Philipines) This does not happen in Finland, founded upon Christ's teachings, not some unbiblical traditions. Any religion can be bad, violent, warlike, abusive, but the worst ones do not obey Christ. Christ did not come to establise a religion, but to reinstate our relationship with God with the truth that sets us free. The Catholics made a religion out of it, and Islam was set up specifically as a religion.
Are the blacks in Africa freer than those in America? Nobody would dispute the fact that American blacks are free today, Oprah Winfrey is a prime example, while the blacks in Africa are not, especially Muslims. And more African countries are falling under Islamic lost freedom. Remember what Jesus said: "the truth shall set you free" - conversely, falsehood will enslave nations. But what about atheism, does that not provide freedom? No, all countries practising the religion of atheism are countries where the people are not free and violence reigns. If a country is in trouble, economy is collapsing, things are getting worse, the first place to look is whether the people are following the teachings of Jesus Christ. Has the need for political correctness taken that away?
If you don't like religion, I don't blame you. You and I have something in common. But can you truthfully say that what Jesus taught is bad for our society? If you don't know, check it out and I am sure you and I will agree that the answer is "no" we need more of it. Thank you for your interest.
Racist violence: Racism in Finland. Settlement of Somalis in Finland.
ompi Linnamme ja muita MIDI
Listed below are links that you may find interesting and informative.
The writer does not necessarily endorse or agree with all positions of
- Evangelical Lutheran Church
- What the Bible says about money and love of money.
- Focus on The Family - Dr.
- Canadian Radio About the relatively few Canadian Christian radio stations. There are no Christian radio stations in Vancouver BC, but there are at least four stations broadcasting in Punjabi and Mandarin/Cantonese. Problem: CRTC.
- Gay Rights Gone Wrong In Canada saying or even implying you don't agree with the gay life-style means you could be charged with assault. The Bible? They call it a biggoted book, which should be banned. They are accusing Christians of hate crimes, just because they disagree with their sex practises, which they never fail to wave in your face. Because they know you could be charged for doing anything about it. Is it good for the community? Are they hypocrits? Are they a truth or lies based organisation? Find out. What is happening to our "freedoms?" When will all people interested in truth, turn around united and stand up against these attacks and on their beliefs, which are being trampled to the ground?
- Child Pornography - Soon it may be illegal to say anything bad about child pornography too. Only in Canada, the land of the free.
- Does Islam preach war or peace? (SWRC)
- Treatment of Christians in Egypt
- SWRC - more real audio - re US immigration descrimination against Christians, and for Muslims. Senator Edward Kennedy to blame.
- Islamic barberians
- Discussion: Koran vs. Bible- Comparing Allah of the Koran and God of the Bible.
- Why Would Mohammed...- Questions about Mohammed's knowledge.
- How Muslims attack Christianity.- Typical Muslim arguments against the Bible.
- Southwest Radio Church- Very
thought-provoking subjects you can LISTEN to.
- What is a Christian to do? - How a Christian can make a difference for the betterment of the community.
- The Plain Truth
- Seventh Day Adventists Very nice sincere Christians and personal friends, but their prophets E.G. White and William Miller, and therefore doctrines, are suspect.
- Seventh Day Adventists and justification by faith alone.
- What must you do to be saved?
Holy Bible - on line.
- The Holy Bible - comparisons
with politically correct new versions
- Christian Search Engine
- Creation Science
King James Bible
- Who is Jesus? -
for those who don't know, VIDEO with SOUND: English, Russian, Hungarian, and many other languages.
- In Touch Ministries
Robert Schuler - American TV evangelist. Invited to the
Soviet Union in 1989 by Gorbachev and his program is seen all over Russia
on TV. Began the most successful agricultural aid program in Russia.
- World Bible Society
- Bible Answer
Man - answers questions regarding Bible.
- The Rutherford Institute -
deals with legal issues regarding freedom of religion
- CFC Ministries -
carreer and money management - money management councelling
Miracle: Back from the dead. Story from Moscow.
Orthodox Idols Icons: is their worship biblical?
Jesus Still Heals:
- You Can Be Healed Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever.
- Tom Brown Ministries God Can Heal You
- Scientific Evidence for Devine Healing - A Catholic looks at Protestant healing claims.
- Marilyn Hickey Why I Believe Jesus Heals
- Free of Bulimia Ministries According to YOUR FAITH be it done unto you!
- Discussion About Healing Index Discussion about the foundations of your faith in being healed.
- Modern Manna Cancer Cured
- Healing From Christ T.L. Osborn
- Scripture Designs Why God Can Heal You
- Dr. Lorraine Day God's healing plan
- Scripture relating to healing
by Proxy: Don't Have Them If You Won't Raise Them
- by Laura C. Schlessinger
Bible from Amazon.com - a Bible for your home
Revival : Unmasking the Truth Behind the World Wide Counterfeit Revival
book by Hank Hanegraaff
Revival by Hank Hanegraaff - Audio Cassette Csst edition (April 1997)
25 Most Common Problems in Business: (Book) And How Jesus Solved Them
Believe by Dan Wooding, Hannu Haukka:
Discussion Groups: (Not necessarily the author's opinions)
- Christian: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal
- Christian: alt.religion.christian
- Christnet Theology: alt.christnet.theology
- Mormon: alt.religion.mormon
to Page 1
to Uralic Family Home Page.
© 1998 - 2004 Osmo Joronen